who owns 1win
| Owner | 1win NV (MF Investments) |
|---|---|
| Headquarters | Chisinau |
| Establishment Year | 2019 |
| Languages | English, German, Italian, Romanian, Swedish, Polish, Hindi, French, Portuguese, etc. |
| Sports Betting | Football, Basketball, Tennis, Hockey, Golf, MMA, Boxing, Volleyball, Cricket, Dota 2, CS:GO, Valorant, League of Legends, etc. |
| Bet Types | Single, Express, System |
| Casino Games | Slots, Baccarat, Blackjack, Roulette, Poker, Aviator, TV Games, Bonus Buy, Jackpot Games, Lottery, etc. |
| Platforms | Official website, Mobile site, Android and iOS apps |
| License | Curacao 8048/JAZ 2018-040 |
| Live Streaming | Yes |
| Statistics Available | Yes |
| Payment Methods | Credit Cards, Bank Transfer, E-wallets, Cryptocurrencies, Perfect Money, AstroPay |
| Minimum Deposit | $15 |
| Welcome Bonus | 500% up to $11,000 |
Ownership of 1win
Determining the definitive ownership structure of 1win presents a challenge due to conflicting information available publicly. Sources cite various entities, leading to ambiguity. MFI Investments Limited is frequently mentioned, alongside 1win N.V., suggesting a complex corporate arrangement. Furthermore, Dama N.V. is also identified as an operator, raising questions about the precise hierarchical relationships and ultimate beneficial ownership. This lack of transparency necessitates further investigation to establish a clear and accurate understanding of the ownership.
Conflicting Information on Ownership
Publicly available information regarding the ownership of 1win is inconsistent and contradictory. Multiple sources attribute ownership to different entities, creating significant uncertainty. This discrepancy hinders the ability to definitively identify the ultimate beneficial owner(s) and the precise corporate structure underpinning the operation of 1win. The lack of a clear and unified statement on ownership raises concerns about transparency and accountability;
MFI Investments Limited
MFI Investments Limited is frequently cited in online discussions as an entity associated with the ownership or operation of 1win. However, the precise nature of this association remains unclear. Further investigation is required to ascertain whether MFI Investments Limited holds direct ownership, acts as a subsidiary, or plays another role within the broader corporate structure of 1win. The lack of readily accessible, verifiable information regarding MFI Investments Limited’s relationship with 1win necessitates caution in drawing definitive conclusions.
Dama N.V.
Several sources identify Dama N.V. as an operator of 1win. This suggests a potential role in the management and day-to-day operations of the platform, but not necessarily outright ownership. The exact relationship between Dama N.V. and the ultimate beneficial owners of 1win requires further clarification. It is crucial to distinguish between operational control and legal ownership when analyzing the role of Dama N.V. in the context of 1win's corporate structure.
1win N.V.
The presence of "1win N.V." in discussions surrounding the company's ownership structure warrants careful consideration. While some sources link this entity to the platform, the precise nature of its involvement remains unclear. Further investigation is needed to determine if 1win N.V. represents a holding company, a subsidiary, or another type of corporate entity within the overall ownership framework. Without additional verifiable information, its exact role in the ownership remains speculative.
Jurisdiction and Licensing
The jurisdictional aspects of 1win's operations are significant in understanding its ownership structure. The Curaçao license is frequently cited, indicating a licensing authority outside of many of its target markets. This offshore licensing complicates the straightforward determination of ownership and legal accountability. The choice of jurisdiction and licensing regime can influence corporate transparency and the ease of verifying beneficial ownership information. Further investigation into the specific licensing terms and conditions is necessary to fully understand their impact on the ownership structure.
Curaçao License
The possession of a Curaçao license by 1win is a key element in its operational framework, but it does not directly clarify ownership. A Curaçao license permits operation within a specific regulatory framework, but the licensing process itself does not necessarily reveal the ultimate beneficial owners of the entity holding the license. The license provides legitimacy for operation in certain jurisdictions but offers limited insights into the complex corporate structure behind the brand. Analyzing the specific terms and conditions of the license might offer some indirect clues, but this would require access to confidential documentation.
Registration Location (Cyprus, etc.)
The registration location of a company, such as Cyprus, is relevant to legal jurisdiction and tax implications, but it does not definitively determine ownership. A company might be registered in one location for legal or tax advantages while the actual control and ownership reside elsewhere. Therefore, the registration location, while a valuable piece of information for understanding the corporate structure, does not definitively answer the question of who ultimately owns 1win. Further investigation into shareholder records and beneficial ownership declarations would be necessary to ascertain the true owners.